Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Functional Evidence Across the ALL Subtypes That Matter

xCellSense® profiles primary ALL samples including Ph-negative, Ph-positive, and T-ALL to aid in understanding relapse, resistance, and developing targeted therapies.

Request a Quote
OTHER INDICATIONS
AMLALLNHLMMMDS

The ALL development challenge

ALL spans biologically distinct subtypes (Ph-negative, Ph-positive, T-ALL) with different therapeutic vulnerabilities, and relapse/resistance remains the central clinical problem. Functional data clarifies how an asset performs across these subtypes and disease states.

What we test in ALL

1

Subtype-resolved sensitivity
Ex vivo drug sensitivity testing for your asset and the standard panel across Ph-negative, Ph-positive, and T-ALL

2

Relapse vs. diagnosis
Comparative response in samples taken at diagnosis and at relapse

3

Combination screening
Asset ± backbone agents with synergy quantification

4

Biomarker correlation
Genotype/phenotype-to-response association for enrichment hypotheses

Evidence in Acute lymphoblastic leukemia

  • Our AACR 2025 Special Conference poster showed that ex vivo sensitivity to 21 anti-cancer drugs had strong utility in predicting clinical outcomes across Ph-negative, Ph-positive,and T-ALL
  • An ASH 2024 poster assessed 27 ALL patients at diagnosis and at relapse.
Scientific Publications
Blood Research Journal Logo

Recent advances in and applications of ex vivo drug sensitivity analysis for blood cancers

Blood Research
Learn More →
Presentations

A study on the relationship between ex vivo drug sensitivity and clinical outcome of acute lymphoblastic leukemia

AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Functional and Genomic Precision Medicine in Cancer: Different Perspectives, Common Goals
Learn More →

Why it de-risks development

Subtype-aware patient selection, differentiation of relapse/resistance, and stronger inclusion criteria for ALL trials.

Key Deliverables

01
Subtype-resolved sensitivity (Ph-negative / Ph-positive / T-ALL)
02
Relapse vs. diagnosis comparison in matched samples
03
Combination screening with synergy quantification
04
Genotype/phenotype-response correlation for enrichment
05
Responder segmentation with a ≤21-day turnaround
Let's Talk

Scope an AML Study on primary patient cells

A scientist will scope a tailored AML study and return a design and timeline.